Addis Ababa University International Workshop on PhD Programs- June 19-21 2008, Akaki, Ethiopia
Organizers:  Addis Ababa University
[Your comments]
[From the Silent Observer]

Call for participation

April 24, 2008

To:

Dear Colleagues:

I am writing to invite you to take part in a major initiative in higher education in Ethiopia. The overall objective of the Strategic Plan of Addis Ababa University (AAU) is to produce 5,000 PhD graduates over the next 10 years, and to establish some 14 Centers of Excellence in research and teaching in key prioritized areas. Achieving this goal will require a radical and innovative approach. Since MA/MSc holders are the great majority of academic staff in public and private universities in Ethiopia, the launching of this large-scale PhD initiative is imperative.

This letter includes a brief background of higher education in Ethiopia, a summary of the strategic planning and initiative for PhD programs in Ethiopia, and an invitation to attend an International Workshop on June 19-21, 2008.  This historic meeting will be held at a new university campus completely dedicated to PhD programs in Ethiopia. 

 
Brief Background of Higher Education in Ethiopia.
Higher education in Ethiopia started with the founding of Addis Ababa University (AAU) in 1950. With its several colleges in the various regions, AAU remained as the only higher learning institution in Ethiopia for over forty years. Over the last decade, however, fundamental changes have been taking place in higher education in Ethiopia. Some of the former colleges under AAU were upgraded to full-fledged and independent universities, and 11 new universities are being established. This brings the total number of universities in the country to 22. As a result, enrollment to higher education has increased significantly. 

With the expansion of higher education in Ethiopia, AAU has been entrusted with the critical task of providing highly trained PhD graduates for itself and the other universities. To this end, AAU has shifted its mission from being a primarily undergraduate/teaching institution to research/graduate training university.
 

In terms of graduate education, graduate programs started at AAU in 1978. Over the last thirty years, a total of about 9200 students graduated from the School of Graduate Studies, of which only 66 (<1%) were PhDs, and 60% of the recipients of graduate degrees graduated in the last three years because of AAUÕs recent efforts to expand graduate education.  Thus, graduate enrollment has increased from a few hundred students to several thousands. Graduate student enrollment is currently at 6,000 students, and by the year 2010, the projected intake is expected to increase to 12,000. At present, there are a total of 146 graduate programs (94 Masters, 27 PhD, 14 Clinical Specialty Certificate, 1 Clinical Specialty Diploma, 1 Postgraduate Certificate and 1 Postgraduate Diploma) at AAU. Of the 27 PhD programs, 15 of them have begun in just the last year!  


At present, among the difficulties that the higher education system is facing, the shortage of qualified academic staff is the most important. In order to qualify as a university, the Higher Education Proclamation (N0 351/2003) of Ethiopia stipulates that at least 30% of the faculty should be PhD holders among the academic staff. Even at Addis Ababa University that can claim the best-trained educators, PhD holders count for less than 25% of its Ethiopian academic staff.   Addis Ababa University can only meet the 30% requirement through the employment of expatriate staff, and the recognition of MD and special certificate holders equivalent to PhD holders. The situation is even more dismal in the newly established universities. As of today, the need for of qualified PhD holders in public universities alone is estimated to be around 3,000. Recruiting expatriate staff from different countries on a contractual basis cannot bridge this gap because EthiopiaÕs ability to attract highly qualified and experienced expatriate staff from the international labor market remains a major difficulty due to international competition.
 

Strategies adopted by Ethiopia to develop its human resources at the PhD level in the past focused either on sending graduate students abroad for full-time academic programs, or using the Òsandwich model, with degrees offered jointly by AAU and foreign universities, with students taking all or part of their coursework in other countries. These two models of graduate and doctoral education have produced only a very limited number of the qualified staff needed by the country. These approaches have severe limitations; both are costly and moreover, after completing their studies a significant number of graduate degree holders fail to return to Ethiopia. Thus, AAU is assuming the responsibility for graduate education in Ethiopia, thereby strengthening the overall higher education capacity of the country
!  

Strategic Planning and the Initiative for PhD Programs in Ethiopia
. At Addis Ababa University, officials have been working for several years to develop this idea.  AAU formulated its five year Strategic Plan during 2006/07. This strategic planning process was comprehensive. It consisted of a series of consultative meetings with students, academic and administrative staff. Important academic, research and administrative issues were identified and analyzed. Stakeholders representing government, private sector, and international institutions were consulted during the strategic planning process. The draft plan was enriched through these discussions and recommendations have been incorporated in the final document.

The University's Strategic Plan clearly indicates that the major option for national capacity building to produce highly qualified human resources—both in quality and in numbers—is launching local PhD programs at a large-scale at AAU. Moreover, the approach used at AAU during the last three years in the expansion of graduate education at the MA/MSc level, should also be replicated at the PhD level. Addis Ababa University is designated as the most suitable national institution to accomplish this task because of its recent but ample experience in developing new postgraduate programs, research, and international relations with several leading universities around the world.
 

As previously noted, the overall objective of the Strategic Plan of the University is to produce 5,000 PhD graduates in 10 years, and to establish some 14 Centers of Excellence in research and teaching in key prioritized areas
.  Our vision has been articulated as AAU Aspires to be a Preeminent African Research University. To realize this vision, AAU will develop and offer graduate programs, especially PhD programs covering all relevant fields. This will include disciplinary as well as multidisciplinary/interdisciplinary programs. And, in so doing, AAU will link its PhD programs to areas of thematic research. During the plan period—that is, over the next 5 years—the number of PhD programs is to increase to about 85 (about 65 disciplinary-based and about 20 transdisciplinary PhD programs).   

With such an expansion of programs, there is a concern that the quality might be compromised. According the Higher Education Relevance and Quality Assurance Agency (HERQA) of Ethiopia, all higher education institutes need to perform an internal quality audit. AAU is to undertake such an internal self assessment, as per pre-specified guidelines developed by the Agency. Another attempt to ensure the quality of the proposed academic programs is the development of Academic Development Resource Centers (ADRCs) in all higher education institutes. These units will provide instructional and other pedagogic skills for faculty. In addition, they will establish benchmarks for quality, to which all academic programs need to adhere. A continuous monitoring and evaluation of all new and old programs will be made to ensure the quality of programs and candidates. At the same time, realizing its own limitations to run the envisaged in-house PhD programs, AAU is attempting to bridge the gap in faculty shortage by facilitating various faculty recruitment schemes such as joint-appointments; employing expatriate staff; visiting scholars; staff-exchange from partner institutes; and forming consortia among colleges and universities outside of Ethiopia.
           

International Consortia for PhD Programs in Ethiopia.
The development of international consortia for PhD programs in Ethiopia is a major part of the overall strategy, and one that will, in many ways, shape the ability of AAU to rapidly expand its graduate programs and research. The capacity of the international consortia will be developed through partnerships and networking with universities throughout the world based on areas of mutual interest that may exist between AAU and its Strategic Plan and universities outside of Ethiopia.
The consortias role is multifaceted. This may include offering joint PhD degrees; provision of international faculty services through block teaching of PhD courses in one-month segments; distance teaching; short-term intensive seminars; advising/co-advising of doctoral dissertations; access to facilities of higher education outside of Ethiopia for PhD students (e-library, laboratory, etc); and facilitating short-term exposure to their universities for PhD candidates from Ethiopia.  

To start the development of the international consortia component of AAU's strategic initiative, AAU will convene an international workshop. The workshop aims to achieve the following six major objectives:

 

1)    Develop consortia for each academic track (Health Sciences, Social Sciences and Humanities, Science and Technology, Development Studies, Administration Sciences, Art and Design Studies, etc;

2)    Discuss collectively among members of consortia the identification of common research areas;

3)    Identify the comparative advantage for each institution engaged in the consortia;

4)    Develop working and management modalities of the consortia;

5)    Comment and refine draft PhD curricula and plan new PhD curricula to be developed (PhD curriculum already developed by AAU faculty will be sent prior to the workshop);

6)    Plan the next five years of major engagements of each partner institution (faculty availabilities in block teaching or other modalities, advising PhD students, defining research tracks for PhD students, mapping available resources for advising PhD students, identifying new members to strengthen the consortia, and so on).
 

As one of the leading academic/research institute/major partner/international organization with a longstanding partnership with Addis Ababa University—or as a new potential partner for consortia development through AAU's large-scale PhD program initiative—we cordially invite you to send your delegate(s) to the International Workshop to be held in Addis Ababa from 19th  to 21st June 2008. 

 
Prof. Andreas Eshete

President


Please note that AAU will cover the total local costs of participants, and extends other forms of support as required.
The workshop venue will be in the New Campus of AAU at Akaki which is dedicated to the PhD programs of Addis Ababa University.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact:


Dr. Abye Tasse

Associate Vice President for Strategic Planning and International Affairs

abyetas@aau.edu.et, abyetasse@yahoo.fr
Cell phone:+251 911 24 25 38
+25111 123 10 84 or +251 11 123 97 50

Prof. Tsige Gebre-Mariam,Vice President for Graduate Studies and Research

avprgpo@aau.edu.et +251 911 24 25 55
+251 11 123 97 56


Public Comments and Expresson of Support

From: Solomon Dejene (solomondejene@yahoo.com)  

May 23 2008
Dear interested ppl,
The idea is great. But I have a some reservations. While the standard of the undergraduate and post graduate programs are in question how much can one go further for a PhD without strengthening the basis. Besides, such a program needs to grow gradually rather than in such a radical way as if it is a campaign. I see in the idea more of statistical achievement rather than academic. I would rather invest in the upgrading of the standard of the undergraduate and postgraduate fields. Do we have sufficient labs, library facility, intranet and internet facilities? Where do these PhD candidates get their literature while the library is still very poor? I am not against the idea but the way it is to be implemented seems to me in contradition with what it aims to achieve: producing critical thinkers and academics, scientists.
May God give us all wisdom,
Solomon



From: Eric Calais  

May 21 2008
Dear Michael,

These are great ideas and I am glad you are pursuing them. We are interested in helping in any way we can, in particular via our collaboration with the Geophysical Observatory (I am cc-ing this message to its new director Atalay Ayele and to my main contact there, Elias Lewi). I agree that training at the PhD level is critical for science sustainability in Ethiopia. Our current project and its likely follow-ups could certainly provide the material for several of these PhD. I would be delighted to either host some students at Purdue and/or contribute to a PhD program in Geosciences at AAU.

Best regards,
Eric Calais, Professor Voice: (765) 496-2915
Dept. of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~ecalais



From: Charles Barton  

Home page: http://sirius-c.ncat.edu/asn/EGY-AFRICA/
May 21 2008
Dear Abebe,
This is an impressive list of exciting developments. The eGY-Africa message needs to be presented and discussed at the June workshop. A summary of the message is in the attached proposal for and IUGG grant for the 2009 workshop. Please keep Alem and the eGY-Africa group involved.


Perhaps we should use the development of science and internet connectivity in Ethiopia as a case history that can be used to help other countries along the same path. What do you think?


I plan to approach the following two programs to find out if they are interested in running jointly the 2009 eGY-Africa workshop (under some suitable name):
(1) the Inter-Academy Panel on International Issues (IAP) program Digital Knowledge Resources and Infrastructure in Developing Countries. (contact: Paul Uhlir), and
(2) the Global Alliance for Enhancing Access to and Application of Scientific Data in Developing Countries (e-SDDC), which is one of the “Communities of Expertise” of the UN GAID and is designated for implementation in the area of “Education” (contact: Liu Chuang).


Best wishes,
Charlie

-----
Charles Barton
Research School of Earth Sciences
Australian National University
Canberra ACT 0200 AUSTRALIA
General use: cebarton@gmail.com; tel: +61 2 6227 9662
Office:
charles.barton@anu.edu.au; tel: +61 2 6125 5519



From: JPR Ochieng'-Odero (jodero@icipe.org)  

Home page: http://www.icipe.org/arppis
May 21 2008
Dear Dr. Tasse and Prof Gebre-Mariam
I am pleased to lean of your workshop to discuss expansion of the PhD programme.

As you may be aware, ICIPE has collaborated with AAU for quite sometime now in the training of MSC students in insect science. We would wish to expand that programme to include PhD training. I am copying this e-mail to Dr. Gurja Belay of the Department of Biology who coordinates that programme.

With best regards,

JPR Ochieng'-Odero PhD, Strategic Partnerships & Capacity Strengthening
& Network Coordinator, ARPPIS
icipe-African Insect Science for Food and Health
P. O. Box 30772-00100, GPO, NAIROBI; Kenya
Tel: 254-20-8632503, 8632000
Fax: 254-20-8632001/2
Home Page: http://www.icipe.org/arppis



From: Tazabi  

May 20 2008
The idea is great; however the quality of the plan looks unfeasible. First of all, you need to focus on changing the overall curriculum starting from high school. The Higher institution in Ethiopia needs to maintain its quality and standard in an acceptable level, other wise PhD, in nothing but a name! You need to encourage Ethiopian loving people who lives abroad to come and help their country without any fears! You need to have seminars in Ethiopia and Diaspora and get an intellectual feedback, Let every one involve for a better result !!!!!!




From: Nega Debela (negadebela@hotmail.com)  

Home page: http:/http://www.marshall.edu/gsepd/faculty_staff/Vitae/debela_vita.htm
May 19 2008
This is a superb idea!I strongly believe that education is a key to solve most of our social, political, economical and of course, educational problems. I will attend a conference in Australia in about the same time that you are conducting your conference and hence am sorry to miss this great opportunity to participate in the conference. However, I will be willing to support the idea in any capacity (preferably in designing online courses, providing short term intensive seminars)as I am currently involved in doctoral program at Marshall University. As a senior Fulbright scholar, I would use the opportunity to provide short term seminars for doctoral students in the field of education, if invited through Fulbright program. Keep up the good work.
Nega Debela, Ph.D.



Addis Ababa University Alumni Association Discussion
Digest on Braindrain
Prepared by Abebe Kebede
[Geographical locations][ESciAN]

Reverse Brain-Drain Model for Ethiopia: The Thailand Model
Abebe Kebede

What is the Thailand-Model for Reverse Brain-Drain ?

The Reverse Brain-Drain Project (RBD)  (http://rbd.nstda.or.th/) is sanctioned by Thailand's National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA).  NSTDA is analogous to Ethiopian Science and Technology Commission (ESTC). 

The Thailand-Reverse Braind-Drain: mission
  • Identify and attract experienced high-level Thai professional living overseas to participate in mission-oriented projects, and promote  development of core teams led by the respective Thai professionals.
  • Promote and facilitate the return of Thai professionals overseas to working government agencies or in the private sector.
The Programs of RBD
  • Special Projects Program (Planning Grant , Project Initiation Grant , Small Project Grant)
  • RBD Distinguished Professor/Scholar Program and RBD/TGIST (Thailand Graduate Institute of Science and Technology, NSTDA) Fellowship Program
  • Permanent Return Program 
  • Technology Transfer Short-Term Visit Program
The Structure of RBD
  • Membership: There are two membership categories a) Professional  b) Organization
  • Special projects: This is the critical component of the project . The special projects are designed to enhance and support NSTDA's  focus areas. There are  four major focus
    • NECTEC: (National Energy Creation(??) Technology)
    • Biotechnology
    • National Metal and Materials Technology  Center
    • TGIST (Thailand Graduate Institute for Science and Technology )
The first three are the national focus areas, and every thing is geared towards achieving  high level of excellence  The last structure is constitutes a virtual network of higher education institutions in the country as well as foreign universities that are engaged in collaborative research with the local universities. It has several components
  • Graduate Research and Education Consortium (GREC)
  • Center for Advanced Studies (CAS)
  • Schools of Engineering Practice (SEP)
  • School of Technology Management (STM)
  • Thailand Training Network (TTN)
  • Science and Technology Electronic Publishing Program (STEP)
Note that the major component of the "Reverse Brain Drain Project", is "the  association for the reverse brain drain project".  That means people understand it , they are willing and committed to participate.

Applying  the Thailand-RBD Model to Ethiopia


In order to apply this model, we need to do two things a) establish a bridge organization that works closely with the a government agency, most probably the Ethiopian Science and Technology Commission (ESTC).

 
Currently, there are several  very small scale Diaspora initiatives that attempt to address the infrastructure and human resource needs.  Particularly activities in providing teaching and learning materials , involvement in HIV/AIDS issues, and participation in major conferences and workshops.. It is also known that Ethiopian faculty members outside Ethiopian are collaborating with their counter parts in Ethiopia. Particularly in agriculture, social work, economics, engineering and other fields. An other good example is the collaboration of NC State with Mekele University to train mathematics teachers is the work of faculty members and students affiliated with NC State. The significant presence of Ethiopian graduate students at Temple University, Case Western and others are good examples of the works of Ethiopian students and faculty  Recently a handful of  Ethiopian graduate students. For example they are becoming instrumental in graduate recruitment proposed a comprehensive student and faculty exchange program that will involve several Norwegian Universities. to start PhD. and MS. Level physics programs.  Until recently, the Ethiopian Scientific Society  was active in providing  awards to outstanding faculty and students at AAU.  Since 2000 AAU-Network has been active in becoming a concept incubator and a gathering place for those interested in addressing critical research and education issues in Ethiopian  higher learning institutions. A handful of proposals are put forth by the group. The list includes AAU-Lecture Hall, Ethiopian Academy of Sciences, Ethiopian Educational and Cultural Society, Global Education Network of Ethiopia, Ethiopian Foundation for Education and the recently  proposed GNEST (Global Network of Ethiopians for Science and Technology)   There are also a host of Ethiopian Professional Societies including the Ethiopian Chemical Society, Ethiopian Economic Association, Ethiopian Physical Society, and Ethiopian Association of Health Professionals that have members participating in Addis Ababa University Alumni Association.  The most pressing issue at this time is to put together these weak strands of activities and come up with a strong organization that will work  with the appropriate institution in Ethiopia .  The Thailand-Model is a excellent starting point to develop the mechanism by which constructive engagement can take places. Reading from the documents posted on ESTC website one can see that the missions of ESTC and NSTDA are the same only different in scale and focus.   An organization such as GNEST will contribute  to the national needs of Ethiopia. ESTC  has six departments and four centers  

The Six Departments
  •     Agriculture and Environment Protection Department
  •     Health
  •     Industry
  •     Patent
  •     Mines, Water and Energy
  •     Science and Technology Popularization
The four centers are

  •    The National Computer and Information Centre (NCIC)
  •    The National Scientific Equipment Center (NSEC)
  •    The Ethiopian Cleaner Production Centre (ECPC)
  •    The National Radiation Protection Authority (NRPA)
It appears to me that a host of education and research niches exist for any one with BS+ education to contribute.  Now the question remains if such organization exist, how is it possible to fund it.  The answer to this question is simple, as long as we know that this is a self supporting, membership and government subsidized organization.

Conclusion


The above point of view is prompted by the AAUAA  discussion threads : "Reverse Brain Drain Models and " African without Borders".  The digest of the two threads is given below.


Thread: Reverse Brain Drain Models
Abebe paused the following basic questions
  •     What must be done to reverse brain drain ?.
  •     Are there models that we can use to address the issue on our own ?
  •     What are the responsibilities of the government ?
  •     What are the responsibilities of the "brain-drainees"?
Reverse Brain Drain Discussion Digest

Mesfin Genanaw Wrote

Clogging Ethiopia's Brain Drain

The so-called "brain drain" —- an exodus of Ethiopia’s educated professionals —- began in the 1970s, when the nation  was in the throes of social, political and economic change. The last three decades brought about endless miseries to our proud  people and nation to the extent that the name Ethiopia has  become a byword for famine, war, disease and poverty. Millions have become refugees, millions have been killed by war, and  millions have been orphaned by HIV/Aids pandemic and other  public health catastrophes Ethiopia’s prized physicians, professors, engineers, agricultural experts, and other  professionals left their country in droves.

What are the causes of this exodus? Why have many of Ethiopia’s best and brightest abandon their country and people? Or is it   just the greediest? What should the nation do to lure back its talented émigrés? Keeping in mind the perils of trusting the observations of a one-person focus group, read on.

Core reasons of the brain drain

In the past, Ethiopians were not known for leaving their country  for good. The godless communist rule of the former military regime and its rein of terror forced many to flee from their beloved country. As if the 17-year ordeal under Mengistu’s rule was not enough, the new regime took power in 1991 only to exacerbate the nations tribulations. It’s divisive ethnic policy and its disdain for the intelligentsia drove many educated  professionals to run off to the west and else where in the  world. Cases in point are the summary dismissal of 42 renowned professors from Addis Ababa University in 1994 and the brute force used to silence and kill dissenting university students in  April 2001. Frustrated by the intransigence of the government to address public health problems, many physicians abandoned  their dying people. Clearly, those who had seriously   considered to return back home to help their people would not be encouraged to do so under such brute environment. If you allow me to use the American expression to put across core problems in  one phrase, it is the regimes "stupid".


 Other factors for the brain drain include: better economic opportunity in the west, formation of families in the country of  residence, the pursuit for advanced education and experience, allurement to western democracy and freedom, fear of becoming misfit in the country of birth, etc. Most of the latter factors, however, are more attuned to clogging the reversal of the brain drain than being causes for the brain drain.

 What must be done!

Brain drain is a global problem. India alone loses about 100  thousand professionals to the US every year. The harsh reality is that only a handful of countries have been successful in luring their talented and wealthy émigrés back home. The  multitude of problems our nation is currently facing makes the problem even more complex. The regime has to make genuine change in its policies to clog the brain drain. The political and economic environment must be more conducive to its citizens. People should be free to express their thoughts without fear of persecution. People shouldn’t be forced to carry ethnic  identity. They should regain their Ethiopian identity. The  divisive ethnic based politics should go into its grave. Land must be privatized to encourage agriculturists develop commercial farms where ever they choose, not where the government want them to invest. The first attempt must be to devise all policy measures to keep the professionals and entrepreneurs in the country. There is no point in asking those  who have left to come back while the very policy of the regime is to repel those who are within.

Roles for the Alumni

We should do more than blaming the regimes for all the ills the  country is facing. We need to involve ourselves in the  economic, social and political problems our people are currently facing. We need to organize our communities to help the poor. Sponsor Aids orphans. Focus on activities that have lasting  impacts than on the immediate problems. Help your alma mater in every way you can so that it survives the onslaughts on its very existence. Be voice to the voiceless many. To speak up for the good of our people and nation is not to become cheap politician. We are defending a noble cause. We’re defending your own existence. We’ve to at least make some noise to bring about change or get the attention of the powers that be. Mute people do not bring change. Get education and knowledge, so that  some day we turn the brain drain into brain gain. Take your own pick but be a part of something bigger than yourself to help a nation mangled by war, ethnic politics, disease and corruption.   If we do nothing or stay mute, dictators will always come with their super-size egos, their entourage of sycophants, and their penchant for violence. And above everything else, pray to the almighty God that Ethiopia’s endless miseries go away.

Dr. Abebe, briefly this is my take on this topic. Thanks for your efforts.
Warmest,
Mesfin
Genanaw

Sisay.Asefa wrote:  

I see that the issue of "Brain Drain" is back. Let me share some  personal perspectives in addition to what has already been  noted. You all have good points. I will organize my comments into the following:

I)    Push and Pull  factors,

II)    The U.S and the "Brain Drain,
III)    How "victims" may  benefit from the so-called "Brain drain" or how to move from brain  drain to brain gain.

I) Push and Pull factors

It is true that both push and pull factors are relevant in  determining "brain drain", but their relative strengths varies  among countries and over time. Push factors include both economic ( lack of opportunity, employment, poverty, etc.. at home) and  political ( fear of political prosecution, lack of opportunity for  lack of meaningful political participation, and personal security,  etc..). Both are present in African states, but their relative  strengths vary among states and over time depending the types of  regimes. For example, for Ethiopia and Nigeria, the push factors  were the greatest under the Mengistu and Abacha regimes  respectively. For Ethiopia they reached their maximum during the  period of the Derg's terror years, 1976-77. One can say that there  were no push factors during the pre-derg years. In fact, one can  count on one hand the number of Ethiopians who chose to remain 
abroad during pre-1974 period. Not all African states are victims of "brain drain". If you are  national of Botswana, you would have no desire to remain in the US  following completing of your higher education.  There are no push or  pull factors that are strong enough for a Botswana national to  migrate. The reason is obvious. It has to do with the fact this  country has the most efficiently managed economies in Africa. More  important, it has a political system that is accountable and responsive to the needs of its citizens. It has a truly democratic  system of governance combined with one of highest per capita  income in the region. For countries such as Japan and Sweden, there  are neither push or pull factors that result in brain drain for the  same reasons. There are countries where economic pull factors are  more important than political. These include nations such as India,  China, and Pakistan for example.

II)  The United States and the "Brain Drain"

The single largest gainer of international brain drain is the United  States. But, this is due no fault of the Country. Instead, it should  be credited for providing opportunities under its relatively open  economic and political system, for peoples of other cultures and  countries. The fact that the U.S. can accommodate the international  migration of labor better than any other industrial nation is also  related to the historical formation of the U.S itself. The U.S. is  a nation state which is a product of "brain drain" and  international migration of labor in general. The ancestors of today's  Americans came in large numbers during last century in large  numbers. Some of them were "pushed" by poverty and famine such as  the large migration of the Irish by the "Great Irish Potato  Famine". Others such as our African-American brothers and sisters  were forced or pushed by slavery. The migration of labor and brain  drain to the U.S. is continuing but it is really insignificant by  historical standards. The fact that U.S. has benefited from this situation is obvious, and needs no further explanation. If you were to do a little research and figure out how many of Nobel Laureates  are "Americans" or U.S. born one would find the number to be low.  ( It would be interesting to find such numbers for various  disciplines for this year as the announcements are being made??.)

III)    How to benefit from 'brain drain" or how to move from brain drain  to brain gain.....

Brain drain is a result of individual responses to political and  incentives ( push and pull factors). Individuals make a migration  decision by comparing expected benefits ( economic & others..) to  expected costs, including opportunity costs i.e. what they give up  at home by migrating. As long as the expected benefits are greater  than expected costs of migration, rational individuals will migrate.  The trick then is to raise the costs of migration, not by forcing  people not to leave home, but by providing better opportunities at home.


The following are some of the ways countries can benefit or (have  benefited) from brain drain or move from brain drains to brain gain.

1) Encourage remittances from migrants ( for example, the Cuban  Economy significantly depends on Cuban exiles in the U.S., most of  which live in Florida. More significant will be for a country to  encourage investment from its natives in the Diaspora.

2) Participation of migrants in the economic development of their  home country on individual and collective basis. ( Indians and  Pakistanis for example make significant contribution to their home  economies this way..)

3) Using Information Technology (IT) and the Internet in the areas  of distance education and research. There is a significant  opportunity and talent that can be exploited by Ethiopia in this  area. What is needed is good will and reduction or removal of  political obstacles.

4) The DV- situation is generally does not involve "brain drain". It  is migration of unskilled labor and their families. Whether it is  beneficial for those involved depends on their age, motivation, and  other personal characteristic. Generally, DV is beneficial for young  individuals who are hard working, well motivated with average  intelligence or more. It may not be good for older individuals (  over 60 or so), unless they are involved in bringing young family  members who may benefit from it.

6) Finally, for countries such as Ethiopia to reverse 'brain drain"  they must make massive investment on their people in the following  areas:
a) A significant reduction in poverty through economic growth and  employment creation,
b) In the area of higher education and research, Ethiopia needs to  compensate scarce professionals significantly to provide incentives  for them. These involves raising current salary levels  significantly, and more important providing adequate housing,  schools, for those with young children. Some of our African  neighbors such as Tanzania and Uganda who used to suffer from  massive brain drain are reversing it significantly. The  Universities of Dar es Salaam and Kampala have significantly raised  compensation to their staff, and improved academic and research  environment. As a result, academic and intellectual life is back to  both universities. Ethiopia can do the same, if there is a will. The bottom line is that "brain drain" is realty in the global and  information economy of today. Any one or nation cannot control it. Ethiopians can individually or collectively be useful to  Ethiopia both from being home and from abroad.

Damtew  wrote
 
As a member of a panel of experts that deliberates on brain drain  issues, I felt obliged to say a little more on the current debate on brain    drain issues.  I really do not wish to indulge myself in the causes of brain drain    but simply wish to peg it by stating that, the motivation of scholars to    immigrate or their decisions to stay abroad is a product of a   complex blend  of economic, political, social, cultural, and personal matters. The   impact  and chemistry of each factor varies from country to country, from individual to individual, and fluctuates from time to time ? even to a single individual.

Many attempts have been made to regulate the flow of experts by national governments, NGOs and international organizations. Unfortunately most of these initiatives have either simply failed or had very little visible results. In light of mounting urge to migrate as well as continued failure of policies and initiatives to curtail the tide of flow, the policies, the paradigms, and the models of perceiving brain drain is changing. And "brain drain" remains now as a generic term for migration.
 
Is brain drain a serious problem? The answer is an overwhelming yes and particularly so in Africa and the Third World as a whole. What can be done to deal with it? What do countries do to tackle it? What success stories do  we witness?
 
For the purpose of this discussion, I shall be brief. The current trend and model to deal with brain drain issues are to actively involve the immigrant community ? what is now widely known as the Diaspora community ? (wherever they reside) as a development partner in building ‘home’ countries. The Diaspora community now commands a tremendous amount of tangible and ‘virtual’ resources.
By tangible I mean monetary and technical resources. Examples abound. The estimated three million Ghanaian Diaspora, 300,000 of whom professionals  that reside outside the borders of the country send remittances that reach  US$300-400 million per year. This amount has become the third largest  foreign exchange earner for the country exceeding receipts from the sale of  timber and timber products. How are we doing, we Ethiopians? Over 400  million USD is sent as remittances to the country from more than one million  Ethiopian Diaspora all over the world. For sure this figure is an  underestimation of what gets to the country, as there are many ways in which  money is transferred.
 
 By virtual resources I mean the clout and the voice the Diaspora communities command in the country where they reside, in the offices they work, and the  research endeavors they undertake that may have direct or indirect impact on  the country. There is no need to say more here; but I just want to point the  influence of the Jewish Diaspora in the US and all over the world.  So the model to dealing the issue of brain drain has now shifted from barring "passengers" from their destination to one of actively tapping them in the host countries. Conscious of this, many African countries have  organized major international conferences and promulgated proclamations to  attract and engage their citizens (and their descendents) in nation  building. I recall that the Ethiopian government has sometime back established a Directorate to handle such matters in the Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; I do however have very limited knowledge on the  function of the office and what it has achieved so far; and I hope someone  will enlighten us here.

It must be reiterated in general that national (home) governments must take a proactive, genuine, and committed effort to ensure that Diaspora  communities play an important role in nation building. They have to make  sure that they promulgate policies to encourage Diaspora communities to  participate in all issues of national concern. Let me draw some possible  examples. They can direct their universities to forge strong bond with organized scholarly communities abroad. They can facilitate and invite the scholarly community to participate in major national policy debates and  discussions. They can actively engage with the Diaspora communities to  attract funds from international organizations, NGOs and governments, and so  on and so forth. This is what is happening in many countries where governments and the Diaspora maintain a healthy relationship.
 
 That said, lack of government cooperation and support, while it could stifle Diaspora efforts, do not have all the powers to completely thwart Diaspora  initiatives. There is a space where the Diaspora can continue to cooperate  and contribute with no or limited engagement of the Diaspora community with  governments in home countries. In the absence of healthy ? not necessarily  cordial ? relationship, the great resources to a nation would be lost. And  in many countries this is unfortunately the cause.

For that matter, the model for current trend strongly suggests that while  the (professional) Diaspora community organizations and the government needs  to work closely, they (the Diaspora community) should not appear to be close  to governments nor should they appear to collude with their oppositions.  Some cases indicate that, newly elected governments (that were in  opposition) felt that some professional Diaspora communities were close to the (outgoing) government and as a consequence curtailed their interaction  and cooperation with them. [It should be cautioned here that Diaspora  communities are not monolithic entities. They come in all forms and shapes.  The concern and the point of discussion here are generally focused on  professional and/or scholarly Diaspora communities. I am aware that even  this qualification may not suffice as a disclaimer.]

 
The causes and effects of migration are diverse and complex. My discussion above is only confined to ‘managing’ the immigrant community and tapping  their resources -- in a situation where big and potential migrants exist and  migration is a major and common phenomenon of national life. Migration is a  dynamic process: some countries that were complaining the loss of their  intelligentsia a decade or so ago have managed to put in place appropriate  and healthy policies to attract them back. It should be made clear that a country does not necessarily have to lose individuals by way of immigration  to render them ‘out of commission’, i.e. relinquish them as immigrants or  may I dare say brain drainees. We know all too well that many graduates in  Africa and the Third World roam the streets unemployed or underemployed  (what is termed brain hemorrhage) -- which is a subject of another major  discussion.
 
So the bottom line for a country that is seriously afflicted by brain drain is to make sure that its Diaspora communities are actively engaged and  significantly contribute to nation building. The contribution to nation  building can be dramatically enhanced if the Diaspora communities are  purposefully organized and mobilized to action. The role of leadership of the Diaspora communities and the government to mobilize them cannot be  overemphasized. Needless to say, the task of engaging the Diaspora community  is not that simple. It gets even more formidable in the absence of a healthy  relationship between the Diaspora communities and their governments. In any  event the movement and debate from brain drain to brain gain continues...

 
Dagnew wrote:

1) What must be done to reverse brain drain ?.

To reverse brain drain physical presence is not quite an obligation. It is not wise to suggest every Ethiopian have to return home, because it is almost impossible. According to me we don't have to wait the government's initiative to make Ethiopia to gain her intellectuals support and help. We have to start by ourselves, if possible will be better outside the governmental structure, but with the permit and knowledge of the government. This is to preserve the political freedom of individuals, but we need full support from the government (like the Thai's). And if we express our willing to participate (partial or fully) in the country's development programs, I am sure the government will accept us with open hands. For the beginning, We can:

a)    (like the Thai's) participate in the science and technology development in our respective subject in the researches, and government and private projects,  
b)    invite junior investors (including rich Ethiopians) to invest in various economic sectors (this is important subject), we do not need to dream huge investment. "Let's try to make Ethiopia as the most Exporting country (within certain years), just in East Africa Region"
c)    participate as guest lecturers in all the Universities in Ethiopia and implement regular conference/seminars. Here, the young Ethiopian scientists will get a chance to publish their research work in the Proceedings  of the conference/seminars, and also will share (may be) new scientific knowledge and experiences with the intellectuals (from abroad)

2) Are there models that we can use to address the issue on our own ?(I am assuming that the issue is directed at us)

The Reverse Brain Drain Project of Thailand by National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) can be an effective model that we can use, but we have to ajust to our social and political situations.

3) What are the responsibilities of the government ?

The government have to establish a section within the Ministry of Foreign Affair in co-operation with Science and Technology Development Authority, as well as the University/ies which its mission is to facilitate the necessity (academic and professional) of the Ethiopian intellectuals abroad. And for those Ethiopians who want to return and work at governmental or private companies, this agency have to provide incentives, housing, and other needs which compensate their life in the western countries/US.   

Belai Fikre Mariam Habte-Jesus wrote:
Reverse  Brain Drain in the Context of the Horn and Ethiopia in Particular

We need context for the brain-drain discussion.  I read with interest the issue of brain drain and I would like to bring it home to the experience of the Horn and Ethiopia in particular.  I believe context is critical for such important discussions and the context of the Ethiopian modern historiography is relevant here.  The most important approach is to ask questions, why, how, when  brain drain?  What is the root  cause of brain drain and how can it be reversed or converted into an asset for this and future generations?

Citizens and skilled personnel are the wealth of nations.  Let us start with fundamentals that is people are the most important wealth of the nation.    I will begin with some background and fundamental philosophical thinking to b ring the whole issues in context.  Fist and foremost, people, citizens and that too educated, experienced, wise members of the community are the critical mass and the wealth of any one particular nation. Any nation that wastes or drains this important resource does so at its own peril, regardless of the pretexts or assumed excuses given.

Skilled manpower is the key strategy for sustainable development.  Skilled man or womanpower  can utilize and convert natural resources to the foundation of the wealth of the nation.  Secondly, it is important to realize that the natural resources, specifically, land, water and mineral resources and  other man made properties are critical elements of that the special wealth of that community. Without skilled manpower, natural resources can not be made available to the benefit of the nation.

Competent management that is transparent and accountable.  The most important and third component of this wealth of nations is the management of these critical components of the wealth that is people and natural resources.  In the case of the Horn and especially Ethiopia, what happened to have impacted the three pillars of the triangles of wealth and sustainable development.  Good governance has its foundation in utilizing a competent management and leadership that is transparent and accountable.  Nothing is useful that is not transparent and accountable.  The culture of secrecy and terror has to change.

Scanning the past and the future.  Our crisis began in the early 70s during the last day of Emperor Haile Selassie's Empire of Greater Ethiopia.   First, the most important wealth of the nation that is the people became vulnerable.   starving.  Focusing on events that took place over the past 30 years alone, in the early 1970s during the time of Emperor Haile Sellassie, there were some 200,000 people facing famine.  These people by and large were Tigreans and people of Wollo province.  At the time, this was a new experience and became a very shocking experience that resulted in a series of inappropriate analysis of the situation.  Some hooligans in effect massacred the leadership of two sets of Prime ministers, cabinet members and senior military and civil servants.  Many, now look back and consider that was the beginning of terror and the beginning of gross human right violations which continues to be the cause of Diaspora, refugees which is now being addressed as "brain drain".  Prior to 1974 massacre there was no brain drain to mention in the horn and Ethiopia in particular.

Searching for the real cause of draught in science (facts).   Looking back, now almost 30 years later was the crime of these noble people who perished in the hands of the brutal military junta, not articulating why there was not enough rain or is it because they did not create rain?  As we observe events that followed, draught, famine and civil war have been escalating since then.  No one asked seriously what was the fundamental scientific reason for the loss of rain at the time and even today.   Many now believe it is lack of land ownership and energy in the form of electricity in every home that is accelerating the wood and forest clearance that is in turn accentuating the draught and famine in return.

Electricity and tree planting are part of the solution.  May be electricity to every household will reduce the forest clearance which in turn will protect the humidity, and water resources.  Additionally, it will solve the energy crisis and give opportunities for small-scale cottage industries and bring Ethiopia to the 21st Century communication  age.  Tree planting with soil conservation and irrigation farming could contribute towards a long-term solution.  Not massacring the leadership or potential leadership as was experienced in the early 1970s is the answer.

Competency based leadership tested with time and the filed is necessary.  The response of the mad, hooligan military junta led by the likes of sergeant legesse and captain Mengistu was to wipe any one who was more intelligent, wise and resourceful in the nation.  For seventeen years they have been busy decimating the wise, intelligent, experienced and probably creative members of the community.  Those who are referred to as brain drain by the previous commentators are people who managed against all odds to run away from their respective communities.  Many movies and books can come out how these noble and creative people some of them as young as 10, 13, 16 walked through all corners of the borders of the Horn to be faced with famine, wild animals and snipers like the one we face here in the Metro Washington DC area.

The victims of terrorism are not the cause of brain drain.  The majority ended in Western Europe, which accepted them as refugees or exiles.  These noble, brave people some managed to go to school and others managed to work in their area of choice but many remained undertaking lowly and inappropriate jobs for their skills, competence and educational  background.  I know some are still trying to build their lives.  The posttraumatic syndrome they suffer is enormous.  Many have not seen their family members and more have lost them in the stupidity that ensued.  Now, can any intelligent discussion expect these people who constitute almost the majority of the exile community as causes of brain drain.

Terrorist victims need to be rehabilitated by returning their properties back.  Now the new leadership in the region, after confiscating their properties and almost counting them as non-citizens is expecting $500 from each exile who wants to return and invest in his or her community to get an identity card.  Can you imagine this?  Then they are expected to go back home and rent the very homes they built and their parents built while the new leadership leaves in one and some two villas that do not belong to them.  Just imagine the type of wealth drain and utmost injustice that these exile communities now referred as to Ethiopians with foreign passports feel.  So who is draining whom? is the real question.

The exodus was to save ones lives and not for brain drain.  Ten years later after the first crisis, in the 1984/5, there were 5 million people starving this time from all over the country.  Civil War is raging and now all the neighboring countries of the region are involved in some form of terror to their people and their neighbors.  More people ran for their lives and the majority of the current exile community referred to as the critical mass of (??) the brain drain left during this madness of the communist junta and terror in the all the horn countries.   This trend has not yet been reversed and we are into the same game now.

The peasants and military junta all made the same mistakes.  The peasants came into  the city and did exactly what the military junta did.  There comes another season of the early 1991/92, another  exodus of all  the peasants moved in to the cities with kailashkinovs and up rooted the whole citizenship of the cities and now for the first time, all city citizens left in masse to save their skins.  Here, ethnicity, party alliance and all forms of terrorist activities were unleashed on the whole citizenship to run away for their lives.  Now over the past 10 years, not only do we have the university professors, senior civil servants and business people, young people and the peasants themselves who managed to escape the snipers or hellish prisons started to evacuate their homes.  Thank God for Diversity Visa some managed to come in some form of human civility to the United States.  So, I wonder if one calls these brain drain, or human resource drain all together.

The culture of terror needs to change.  The old bandits now formed respective governments and went back to their old ways.  Today, in the latter part of 2002, after 2 years of madness and civil war that cost over 100,000 lives and over $3billion dollars almost a  million a day, we have a new wave of refugees and emigrants.  Now again, like the first time some 30 years ago, the most experienced and talented group are running for their lives.

Brain drain follows terrorism and civil unrest.  So this issue of brain drain should be really referred to human resource genocide and human right violation rather than attempting to blame the very people who are running away from terror.  I wonder if some of the writers on this topic could tell us or encourage people how they left their beloved homes, good job and peaceful neighborhoods and how did they survive here in the west before we try to make them feel guilty and increase their post traumatic experiences, when most are trying how to be part of the solution to this new wave of famine where over 14 million of 60 million people are facing serious starvation.

Erasing one's memories is allowing the same mistakes to be repeated.  The challenge now is how to reconcile these glare inconsistencies of our select  memories.  Asking the fundamental question, of how to bring justice, competencies and transparencies to the Horn, first before we begin putting the blame on the wrong people of side of the argument.

Survival strategies need not be confused with brain- drain.  In the end, people want to survive and not to decimate themselves.  People like to be respected and honored in their homes, at work and their communities.  People will do any thing to seek better lives.  It is better to make our respective home communities attractive enough for others to move in with their resources and talents.  Basic human right protection and good governance should precede brain drain reversal.

Safety, security and human rights precede brain drain reversal.   We cannot expect to have the same people who denigrated our honor and humanity to come and ask us for our limited resources and livelihood to be yet exploited by the same ruthless people.  All properties including housing, land, jobs and neighborhoods that have been confiscated by the military junta and not returned by the current regime should be returned to the people who owned them or to their rightful heirs.  Then, people will invest their time and resources back to their community.  The most critical issue is to create a safe, fair and equitable system that puts every one in the eye of the law on equal footing.  Safety precedes brain drain.

Terror breeds brain drain and good governance reverses it.  My dear friends, it is not brain drain the problem it is terror and human genocide that is raging in the horn, which in turn creates hopelessness, insecurity and massive starvation or migration.  Any leadership that does not recognize that people and talented, educated people are its most valuable resources will decimate all the peasants in to their grave.  An agricultural policy that is bankrupt and does not create alternative employment will continue to depopulate the nation and relegate it to the expanding desert in the Sub Saharan Africa.

Good governance and accountability is the issue.  So, the challenge is good governance, competent leadership and most of all humane society based on the age old culture, tradition of living together where diversity is strength and not a liability.

Asking the right question is a good beginning.  So I ask the question, is it really braining drain or terrorism that is the main cause of the starvation, injustice, and massive exodus of our people.

Sem ena work, work yetale?  I would appreciate a discussion based on  context and clarity that puts all the factors in place and not a sterile discussion of push and pull, there is a lot at stake and much deeper reasons.  May be we just did the "sem" part of our literature and we need to move to the "work" side soon.   Here I am referring to the" Sem ena Work " anthology of our culture  I request to bring the culture back and give us both context and content together for improved understanding of our real challenge continuous internal and external terrorism that is forcing our people in to massive exodus.

Abebe wrote:

At this time, I have documentation of news,  models, activities and UN  documents on the issue of reverse brain drain. I almost finished  reading them. There are a few attractive ones. Among them are    the Chile  Science Institute group and the Thailand Reverse brain
 drain projects  I am learning that in order to perform a measurable  development work,  there needs to be a dedicated "mach maker" or a   bridge organization that connects the expertise abroad with the   immediate and future needs. This is a full time job. I see it  clearly  how such organization can be constructed and become a major   intellectual force. It can also become self supporting consultant   organization, with a potential to attract high tech and high paying   businesses into Ethiopia.  AAU-Network will develop the conceptual  framework of such organization. In fact this could be a component of a   session in the upcoming "Conference on Ethiopian Higher Education" in DC July, 2003 (www.geocities.com/lmak27455/AAU-Conference/index.html)  However I don't believe  a proposal to establish such organization makes  sense without engaging the government on this matter.  What is the   government doing  on these issues ?  Is the government interested

Teshome Mahlet wrote:
\This is my first time responding to threads and I want to take this opportunity to say thank you for let me be a part of this interesting group discussion. I will admit that I didn’t have much chance to fully follow the discussion about the “Reverse brain drain” model as much as I would have liked. So as I put my two cents in, it is possible that I might state the same fact that someone else already has and in that case, I want to apologize in advance for the redundancy. One thing that comes to my mind about this issue as a young professional is that in this day and age, we rarely make a decision about anything without considering the
question “what’s in it for me”. If we direct our focus on businesses in Ethiopia, we can start by looking into what the employee and employer relationships typically are. If for instance you look at the employer/employee relationships here in the US, the more talented you are the more perks and benefits (whether through pay or other like medical etc…) tend to be high, not to mention the security of your job. And this is not just for Americans, but also any other nationalities thanks to the H1-B visa program (which in this case it involves
investments of the company), as well as the infamous DV visa program. This is the type of competition Ethiopian employers face when it comes to the brain drain issue. Of course there is not going to be anything that can solve this overnight. But if you are talking about organizations, what comes to my mind is something that follows a certain model to the betterment of workers as a whole. An organization that promotes things ranging from introducing a program on employee motivation to employers, to pushing the government to help, fund or even make up some law on employee incentives targeted at private and/or governmental offices etc… And I guess one of the main questions also becomes in considering how much the government would be willing to participate in such programs, and if the it is going to be feasible to have such organizations. How can the people in the Diaspora? I guess by keeping the flow of sharing ideas of everyone’s experience in the world of profession, from wherever you may be, and take the positive aspects of all this to try and incorporate that into the process. Hope it all makes sense
Dear colleagues,

Addisu Wrote:
Having read well-thought out argument with regards to "Brain drain" please allow me to say few points before we go to another topic.  I believe honestly that "Brain drain" is a very fancy word to describe to the reality of Ethiopia. It would be very misleading to treat our case as a brain drain. I very much doubt that there exists a brain drain in its real sense.  This is not to underestimate the number of people leaving the country for good.  I agree, broadly speaking the term  "brain-drain" implies migration of badly  "needed" skilled labor to build a county of origin. When we see Ethiopia's case the word "needed" does not exist. The system we have at home for the last 30 years wasn't looking for a skilled and independent thinking being.  So the argument does not hold true that this  "badly needed" skilled force is leaving the country attracted more by comfort of the West.

The truth is, knowledgeable and skilled citizens had been treated as  "reactionaries" or  "chauvinists" to be excluded. Even more the have been relentlessly persecuted and encouraged to leave the country.

So the right way to untapped this vast resource residing in the exile should start with understanding the root cause of the problem.   Majority of graduates leave their country because they think that there is nothing left for them. People fear to express their professional opinion, fear to try to get involved to change or help their own community without coming in to collision with authorities. We all know every activity is measured against political objectives. These independent activities put individuals against the system, which had been worshiping ignorance. The price of trying to change the system is too high to take the risk.  For example, Can any of you feel secured to visit your farmer relatives for few days hoping to work with them and change their way of living without raising suspicion in the local authorities "Geber Meheber"?

At the same time the world is coming closer and the temptation to live in a democratic and just society where hard work is rewarded is tempting.

The political and economic reality of our country is very clear for all us to read the writing on the wall. Almost all of us, except selected few, have no stake in our countries economic and political life.  14 million people cannot produce enough to keep them alive until next harvest or feel free to go to the next village to find temporary work.

Millions of Ethiopians only exist in the statistics book, when the government issue the number of people starving to ask donors for food aid. Apart from that we do not exist or count. We are neither missed nor wanted.
There is no chance for a graduate to work hard and have a stake in the national wealth creation, without getting involved in corruption. No matter one is born smart, he or she cannot aspire to have a say in the national political life or stand for office without having gun-tossing relatives.

Almost all graduates are out of the property ladder. They cannot have a nest to lay their eggs and settle. So the hope of migrating to somewhere, where they can build a nest and start life is very tempting. Thanks to our "revolutionaries" they have made our country totally inhospitable

Let me stop winging and complaining here to suggestions few things. As I suggested above the main cause of migration is the system. We need to have a system where every citizen would have a stake in the country to feel settled. A system of "laws" not a system gun-tossing individuals. A system where people work hard and keep what they earn. A system where people dream grand ideas and have the freedom to try them to bring them to reality.  

I was there and I know how it feels not to have dreams. That is why people leave the country at list to keep their dream alive. So it is for these reasons that I say people fled from the system not from Ethiopia. That is why I say that there was no brain drain. So far I haven't met a genius who is head hunted by Giant Corporation to be lured to the West. Most of us the genius Ethiopians I know were chased away.

So lets encourage freethinking beings, who can turn ideas in to wealth. Lets encourage citizens to have land, properties and stake in the country so that they can invest to lay a better foundation for kids. Even those people who are controlling the political power and national wealth do not have faith in countries future. Most of them still hold their British and American passports and send their children abroad to apply for asylum than help them to have a stake in the country they supposed to lead.  In no way I
call this lack of confidence as "brain drain".
Thread: Africans without borders

1)    Abebe wrote: I always maintain the position that there does not exist braindrain. What exists is brain mismanagement. Africa kills its intellectuals,  Africa does not provide the resources for its intellectuals to do what  they do best. Africa throws away its intellectuals, and it believes in  the solutions that come from its colonial masters. This is a sick  mentality. We can not wait until Africa changes its ways. The African  intellectual power must be developed and organized. I am personally  determined to open channels for thousands of Africans to join graduate  schools to learn science and technology. More PhD for Africans !! Again there is no brain drain. What we must do is train as many  Ethiopians as possible at any location. Be it in Ethiopia or outside  Ethiopia. Listen again, there is no such thing as brain drain. People right here builds South Africa the physics programs in Chaina, India, Pakistan, Israel, in the states and in Europe. Why are we not  talking about the brain drain about these countries ?.  I always worry that there are some special people who are trained to  create a sense of insecurity among Africans to distract us from what  we want to be. So the language Brain Drain is coined to create this  insecurity. In fact other insecurities are deeply ingrained, and any  conversation about Africa is always about disease, poverty, misery, and  death. I believe there are great things about Africa more than there  are bad things.
2)    Girmay wrote:  You are wrong this time... who throw...who? Africa never throw its intellectuals rather gave an ever gain best chance for all the intellectuals abroad or at home, rather according to me the intellectuals throw Africa... just an example you saw Africa in the negative image "(disease, poverty, misery, and death)"  however Africa, especially Ethiopia, have a Beauty side... its nature... which the whole world admits. According to you who have to solve all the existing problems, including the inconvenient reasons for why the intellectuals run away from their home country. As your objective in standing this group, I think is the "intellectuals"... because it will not be wise to wait for those politicians, who I believe are the cause of  multidimensional problems of Africa. Actually this group have to stand in front in fighting against Brain Drain or Sucking Brain (whatever), I mean we have to encourage our intellectuals to build their own home country from inside. Because the contribution from inside is more effective for a dynamic educational,  economic, political, even cultural (technology) change in our country rather than from abroad. Of course it is honorable job to produce more and more Ethiopian PhDs in US or Ethiopia. But we have to understand braindrain is just a term, but it is a reality in the case of Africa.  You said "The physics programs in china, India, Pakistan, Israel, south Africa are built by people right here in the states and in Europe. Why are we not talking about the brain drain about these countries ?. " My answer is: Because even if they are in US, they participate in the development programs of their respective countries actively and with enthusiasm. How can you stigmatize such people in the term "braindrain", because even if they are in US they still work for their country!!
3)    Solomon dejene Wrote: The discussion on brain drain is taking the floor again since a few days. I see quite a number of points you mentioned as causes. But I believe that one thing is very important. All the mentioned points have some truth. I don't think that we have to absolutize one and say that THIS IS THE CAUSE. Of course there are minor and major causes. I believe all of us agree that something has to be done. And this network is trying to contribute something to it. It's obvious that in order to tackle a problem, you need to identify its root causes. There are push and pull factors. If we agree on that, we cannot talk that the one is more significant than the other without having to conduct at least one research. As intellectuals, we have to take care of our conclusions. If we are talking of our individual experiences, we may have seen that by some people the pull factor is higher than the pull factor and by others vice versa. But I don't think that we need to spend much time in discussing whether the pull or push factor is higher.  Abebe has made a point when he said that every individual chooses on his own free will to do what he/she wants.  Having confirmed that, I would also like to add that mobility is one of the 'needs' of people of the post modern era in spite of the fact that most of the countries in the south do not have access to post modern means. I want you to consider hereby the influence of media such as tv, films, radio, etc. Particularly in the cities, children go to the so-called video houses where they watch films without taking into account their age. Most of the films are commercial oriented and exaggerate the reality of the west, depicting it as a kind of fabulous heaven. These children are not in state to differentiate the reality from Hollywood world. So their dream would be determined by what they see. This point might be associated with a pull factor actually, but at the same time indicates a push factor that fails to provide them with the necessary info or to provide them good schooling.   Finally, my suggestion is that on top of the attention given by this network to facilitate higher education, a lot has to be done to basic education too. Without a good elementary school, we cannot have a good high school.  Without a good high school we will be unable to have a good college or university. Do we have something for the kids then????

4)    Girma Hailu wrote: The issue of Brain Drain is multi dimensional and global in nature. I think we should not spend much of our energy because it has self vs. nation competition. To resolve such kind of issue, it requires basic research of the root causes, fundamental challenges and what should be done to address them at least theoretically. I don't think it is a question of Government only it also calls for personal commitment.  The United Nations Development Program started a small program called Transfer of Knowledge through own Nationals (TOKTEN). The main objective was to help nations strengthen their institutional capacity by providing them with professionals living abroad. The program did show some interest from the professional's abroad and countries in Africa. The idea of TOKTN was to kick start the process and those governments will pick it and continue with it since the fund was for short term.  Brain Drain requires a broad based and multifaceted approach to create a conducive environment so that she or he could stay where they deem appropriate except where there are good reasons to let them decide otherwise.   

5)    Capacity Building Consult wrote:  The causes of brain (labor) drain are, as most of you put it, twofold: push and pull factors. I am inclined to give more weight to the push factors &#8211; governance, poverty,  public attitude, etc. These are also within our capacity to overcome and minimize the brain (labor) drain. There is very little we can do about the pull factors ; e.g.  better opportunities abroad.  In our discussion reference was made to individual cases. I think it is important to listen to such cases and stories in order to fully understand the complexity of the problem. Responsible for this phenomenon are the youth, governments,  and parents. The youth need the necessary skills to create opportunities both in-country and abroad (when the chance comes). Governments should improve governance so that society could have confidence in what they do. Parents need to change their attitude that their children could do better abroad only. Many well to do parents are spending thousands to send their children abroad without preparing them adequately for life in the country let alone abroad.  As citizens we have a difficult task and most of the time we don't know where the solution is to come from. Those of us, who had opportunities, need to pull our resources  (know how, material, financial) together and do something. Match the words with practice!